Bernhardt (1998)
Boudett, City, & Murnane (2008)
Frey & Schmitt (2007)
Holcomb (2013)
Love (2008)
Mooney & Mausbach (2008)
Pophan (2014)
Reeves (1998)
Tomlinson (2014)
Read 6 of the 11 assessment articles above through the lens of a principal and write a one paragraph response to each of the six selected articles. After reviewing these articles related to assessment, students will present written and oral overviews of their reading on 9/4. When presenting to the class, powerpoints are welcome but not required. These reviews should highlight the key elements of the reading as well as a personal connection to the material (how it would be used in practice). Using the "agree, aspire, and argue" approach to analysis will help you meet the mark.
Review Criteria:
Thoughtfulness and Depth of Summary
Meaningful
Application of Research for Peers
Application of “agree, aspire, argue”
Rubric: Reflections
on the 6 Articles
Meets Does Not Meet
Thoughtfulness and Depth of Reflections
|
Original reflections demonstrating
significant depth and breadth of the topic
|
Predictable reflections demonstrating a lack
of depth/breadth of the topic
|
Quality of Content
|
Clear, informative, and accurate
|
Lacks clarity, information, or accuracy
|
Professional Presentation
|
Organized and presented in an academic format
using Standard American English
|
Lacks organization, academic format, or
contains significant errors
|
Point of View
|
Written through the lens of a principal
|
Written through the lens of a teacher
|
Grade:
Comments:
No comments:
Post a Comment